↑ V. K. Dmitriev, 1974 (1898), Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
↑ Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz, 1952 (1906–1907), "Value and Price in the Marxian System", International Economic Papers 2, 5–60; Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz, 1984 (1907), "On the Correction of Marx’s Fundamental Theoretical Construction in the Third Volume of Capital". In Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk 1984 (1896), Karl Marx and the Close of his System, Philadelphia: Orion Editions.
↑ M. C. Howard and J. E. King. (1992) A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 1929–1990, chapter 12, sect. III. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
↑ M. C. Howard and J. E. King. (1992) A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 1929–1990, chapter 7, sects. II-IV. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
↑ M. C. Howard and J. E. King, 1992, A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 1929–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
↑ Kliman tuyên bố rằng "Lý thuyết giá trị của Marx là sai nếu nó bản thân tự mâu thuẫn. Những lý thuyết tự mâu thuẫn(Internally inconsistent theories) có thể rất kêu gọi, có vẻ đúng hoặc thậm chí hiển nhiên, và nhất quán với tất cả bằng chứng thực tế hiện có –– nhưng chúng có thể không đúng. Cần phải phủ định chúng hoặc sửa chúng. Thus the alleged proofs of inconsistency trump all other considerations, disqualifying Marx’s theory at the starting gate. By doing so, they provide the principal justification for the suppression of this theory as well as the suppression of, and the denial of resources needed to carry out, present-day research based upon it. This greatly inhibits its further development. So does the very charge of inconsistency. What person of intellectual integrity would want to join a research program founded on (what he believes to be) a theory that is internally inconsistent and therefore false?" (Andrew Kliman, Reclaiming Marx's "Capital": A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007, p. 3, emphasis in original). The connection between the inconsistency allegations and the lack of study of Marx’s theories was argued further by John Cassidy ("The Return of Karl Marx," The New Yorker, Oct. 20 & 27, 1997, p. 252): "His mathematical model of the economy, which depended on the idea that labor is the source of all value, was riven with internal inconsistencies and is rarely studied these days."
↑ "Chỉ một kết luận duy nhất là phương pháp của Marx chuyển đổi giá trị hàng hóa thành Giá thành sản xuất là không hợp lý về logic." Paul M. Sweezy, 1970 (1942), The Theory of Capitalist Development, p. 15. New York: Modern Reader Paperbacks.
↑ Nobuo Okishio, 1961, "Technical Changes and the Rate of Profit," Kobe University Economic Review 7, pp. 85–99.
↑ [P]hysical quantities... suffice to determine the rate of profit (and the associated prices of production).... [I]t follows that value magnitudes are, at best, redundant in the determination of the rate of profit (and prices of production)." "Marx’s value reasoning––hardly a peripheral aspect of his work––must therefore be abandoned, in the interest of developing a coherent materialist theory of capitalism." Ian Steedman, 1977, Marx after Sraffa, p. 202, p. 207. London: New Left Books
↑ "[The falling-rate-of-profit] position is rebutted in Chapter 5 by a theorem which states that... competitive innovations result in a rising rate of profit. There seems to be no hope for a theory of the falling rate of profit within the strict confines of the environment that Marx suggested as relevant." John Roemer, Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory, p. 12. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981.
↑ Vulgar Economy in Marxian Garb: A Critique of Temporal Single System Marxism, Gary Mongiovi, 2002, Review of Radical Political Economics 34:4, p. 393. "Marx did make a number of errors in elaborating his theory of value and the profit rate.... [H]is would-be Temporal Single System defenders... camouflage Marx’s errors." "Marx’s value analysis does indeed contain errors." (abstract)
↑ "An Error II is an inconsistency, whose removal through development of the theory leaves the foundations of the theory intact. Now I believe that Marx left us with a few Errors II." David Laibman, "Rhetoric and Substance in Value Theory" in Alan Freeman, Andrew Kliman, and Julian Wells (eds.), The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2004, p. 17
↑ Andrew Kliman, Reclaiming Marx's "Capital": A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, esp. p. 210-211
↑ Andrew Kliman, Reclaiming Marx's "Capital", Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, p. 208, emphases in original
↑ Bellamy, Richard (2003). The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 60. ISBN 0-521-56354-2.
↑ Bakunin, Mikhail. "Statism and Anarchy". Marxists Internet Archive. Truy cập ngày 6 tháng 8 năm 2008
1 2 Bucholz, Todd. New Ideas from Dead Economists. New York: A Plume Book. 1998. pp 166-167.
↑ John Maynard Keynes. Essays in Persuasion. W. W. Norton & Company. 1991. p. 300 ISBN 9780393001907
↑ Joan Robinson: critical assessments of leading economists, Volume 5 2002 By Prue Kerr, Geoffrey Colin Harcourt p. 491
1 2 3 van Ree, Erik. The political thought of Joseph Stalin: a study in twentieth-century revolutionary patriotism. London, England, UK; New York, New York, USA:RoutledgeCurzon, 2002. Pp. 51.
↑ van Ree, Erik. The political thought of Joseph Stalin: a study in twentieth-century revolutionary patriotism. London, England, UK; New York, New York, USA:RoutledgeCurzon, 2002. Pp. 49.
1 2 van Ree, Erik. The political thought of Joseph Stalin: a study in twentieth-century revolutionary patriotism. London, England, UK; New York, New York, USA:RoutledgeCurzon, 2002. Pp. 52
↑ Conquest, Robert (2000) Reflections on a Ravaged Century. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-04818-7 p. 47-51.
↑ Thornton, Stephen (2006). "Karl Popper". In Zolta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford,
↑ Marxism, by David L. Prychitko: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics: Library of Economics and Liberty
↑ "Pseudoscientific - pretending to be scientific, falsely represented as being scientific", from the Oxford American Dictionary, published by the Oxford English Dictionary; Hansson, Sven Ove (1996). "Defining Pseudoscience", Philosophia Naturalis, 33: 169–176, as cited in "Science and Pseudo-science" (2008) in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
↑ Thornton, Stephen (2006). "Karl Popper". In Zolta, Edward N.. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford
↑ Fukuyama, Francis. "The End of History?". Wes Jones. Truy cập ngày 23 tháng 5 năm 2008
↑ Fukuyama, Francis (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin.
↑ Kolakowski,, Leszek (2005). Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown. W. W. Norton & Company. tr. 523, quyển III. ISBN978-0393060546.
↑ Richard Pipe (2002). “Communism, tr.176” (PDF) (bằng tiếng Nga). Nationalism.org. Truy cập 02 tháng 12 năm 2010. Kiểm tra giá trị ngày tháng trong: |accessdate= (trợ giúp)
↑ Kolakowski,, Leszek (2005). Main Currents of Marxism: The Founders - The Golden Age - The Breakdown. W. W. Norton & Company. tr. 523-524, quyển III. ISBN978-0393060546.
